Pengaruh Kecemasan Dan Conscientiousness Terhadap Keputusan Penggunaan Kontrasepsi Pada Wanita Usia Subur
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32492/idea.v9i1.9110Keywords:
Conscientiousness, Kecemasan, Kontrasepsi, Pengambilan Keputusan, Wanita Usia SuburAbstract
Decision making in contraceptive use is influenced by various psychological factors, including anxiety about the negative effects of contraception and individual personality characteristics. This study aims to analyze the effect of anxiety about the negative effects of contraception and the personality dimension of conscientiousness on decision making in contraceptive use in women of childbearing age. The method used in this study is multiple linear regression involving 120 respondents of childbearing age women. Variable measurements were carried out using the Decision Conflict Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and the conscientiousness dimension of the Big Five Inventory (BFI). The results of the analysis showed that anxiety about the negative effects of contraception had a negative and significant effect on decision making (β = -0.520, p <0.001), while conscientiousness had a positive and significant effect on decision making (β = 0.763, p <0.001). The regression model has an Adjusted R² value of 0.378, which indicates that 37.8% of the variability in contraceptive use decisions can be explained by these two variables. These findings emphasize the importance of managing anxiety and increasing individual awareness in decision-making regarding contraception in order to improve reproductive well-being.
References
Acharya, K., & Berry, G. R. (2023). Characteristics, traits, and attitudes in entrepreneurial decision-making: Current research and future directions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 19(4), 1965–2012.
Dirgawan, M. N., Al Anshary, F. M., & Perdana, I. (2024). Prototipe Sistem Informasi Marketing Kit Berdasarkan Tipe Kepribadian Steadiness. Journal of Production, Enterprise, and Industrial Applications, 2(2).
Ferliandre, A., & Anggraini, M. (2021). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pengambilan Keputusan: Gaya Kepemimpinan, Kepribadian Dan Strategi (Suatu Kajian Studi Literatur Manajemen Sumberdaya Manusia). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 2(1), 13–22.
Genazzani, A. R., Fidecicchi, T., Arduini, D., Giannini, A., & Simoncini, T. (2023). Hormonal and natural contraceptives: a review on efficacy and risks of different methods for an informed choice. Gynecological Endocrinology, 39(1), 2247093.
Khatimah, A. W. N., & Syukur, M. (2024). Kesalahan Berpikir dalam Praktik Judi Online: Perspektif Filsafat Ilmu terhadap Rasionalitas dan Pengambilan Keputusan. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(6), 1749–1761.
Langoday, T. O., Wahyuningrum, C., & Lay, A. S. Y. (2023). Teori Pengambilan Keputusan Bisnis: Pengantar untuk Calon Manajer Hebat di Era Global. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Lauriola, M., Di Cicco, G., & Savadori, L. (2024). Apocalypse now or later? Nuclear war risk perceptions mirroring media coverage and emotional tone shifts in Italian news. Judgment and Decision Making, 19, e7.
M.o’connor, A., Rostom, A., Fiset, V., Tetroe, J., Entwistle, V., Thomas, H. L., Holmes-Rovner, M., Barry, M., & Jones, J. (1999). Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. Studying the Organisation and Delivery of Health Services: A Reader, 319(7212), 731–754. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203337394-20
Mann, L., & Janis, I. (2021). Conflict theory of decision making and the expectancy-value approach. In Expectations and actions (pp. 341–364). Routledge.
Maramis, M. M. (2022). Gangguan Bipolar dan Psikoedukasi Sebuah Kumpulan Materi untuk Petugas Kesehatan dalam Melakukan Psikoedukasi pada Pasien dan Keluarga. Airlangga University Press.
Nilsen, F. A., Bang, H., & Røysamb, E. (2024). Personality traits and self-control: The moderating role of neuroticism. Plos One, 19(8), e0307871.
Poier, S. (2021). Towards a psychology of solar energy: Analyzing the effects of the Big Five personality traits on household solar energy adoption in Germany. Energy Research & Social Science, 77, 102087.
Savioni, L., Triberti, S., Durosini, I., & Pravettoni, G. (2023). How to make big decisions: A cross-sectional study on the decision making process in life choices. Current Psychology, 42(18), 15223–15236.
Stein, D. J., Craske, M. G., Rothbaum, B. O., Chamberlain, S. R., Fineberg, N. A., Choi, K. W., de Jonge, P., Baldwin, D. S., & Maj, M. (2021). The clinical characterization of the adult patient with an anxiety or related disorder aimed at personalization of management. World Psychiatry, 20(3), 336–356.
Yang, Y., Lin, J., Liu, G., & Zhou, L. (2021). The behavioural causes of bullwhip effect in supply chains: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Economics, 236, 108120.
Yuniarti, E., Rusmilawaty, R., Megawati, M., & Kirana, R. (2025). Hubungan Pengetahuan Dan Dukungan Suami Dengan Penggunaan Kontrasepsi IUD Pada Akseptor KB Di Puskesmas Teluk Dalam. Seroja Husada: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 2(2), 339–356.
Zia, Y., Somerson, E., Folse, C., Alvarez, A., Albergate Davis, K., Comfort, A. B., Brown, K., Brandi, K., Moayedi, G., & Harper, C. C. (2024). “I am putting my fear on them subconsciously”: a qualitative study of contraceptive care in the context of abortion bans in the US. Reproductive Health, 21(1), 171.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rochmawati, Hera Lestari Mikarsa, Ira Puspitawati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.











