Turnover Intention pada Gen Z: Peran Meaningful Work dan Work Engagement sebagai Mediator

Authors

  • violla dwi puspita Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
  • Rahmad Purnama Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
  • Ira Hidayati Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32492/idea.v10i1.10101

Abstract

Generation Z is entering the workforce and tends to exhibit turnover intention. Meaningful work is considered as a predictor of turnover intention, however, there is still inconsistencies in the findings of previous research. Therefore, work engagement is considered as a mediator. This study aims to ascertain the role of work engagement as a mediator in the relationship between meaningful work and tunover intention among generation Z. This study was conducted on 130 generation Z employees (aged 18-27 years) with the method used is quantitative and data were analyzed using SEM-PLS with a second order factor model. The results indicate (1) meaningful work has a significant effect on work engagement. (2) work engagement has insignificant effect on turnover intention. (3) meaningful work has insignificant effect on turnover intention, and (4) work engagement does not have a role as a mediator between meaningful work and turnover intention

References

Ågren, S. (2024). Shaping worker-citizenship: Young vocational education graduates’ labour market positionings within new adulthood. Journal of Youth Studies, 27(6), 819–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2023.2174009

Albrecht, S. L., Green, C. R., & Marty, A. (2021). Meaningful work, job resources, and employee engagement. Sustainability, 13(7), 4045. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13074045

Allan, B. A., Batz-Barbarich, C., Sterling, H. M., & Tay, L. (2019). Outcomes of meaningful work: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 56(3), 500–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12406

Amalina, D., Ariani, L., & Julaibib. (2024). Pengaruh meaning of work terhadap work engagement pada pengasuh di panti sosial. Jurnal Psikologi, 1(4), 16. https://doi.org/10.47134/pjp.v1i4.2768

Baklaieva, O. (2016). The relationship among meaningfulness of work, work engagement and intention to leave [Master’s theses]. University of Management and Economics.

Bone, K. D. (2019). ‘I don’t want to be a vagrant for the rest of my life’: young peoples’ experiences of precarious work as a ‘continuous present.’ Journal of Youth Studies, 22(9), 1218–1237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2019.1570097

Chillakuri, B. (2020). Understanding generation z expectations for effective onboarding. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(7), 1277–1296. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02-2020-0058

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral scienes. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cook, J., Threadgold, S., Farrugia, D., & Coffey, J. (2021). Youth, precarious work and the pandemic. YOUNG, 29(4), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/11033088211018964

Dechawatanapaisal, D. (2022). Linking workplace social support to turnover intention through job embeddedness and work meaningfulness. Journal of Management and Organization, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2022.4

Deloitte. (2022). The deloitte global 2022 gen z & millennial survey.

Dewanti, N., Kusnanto, & Yuwono, S. R. (2019). Peran work engagement dalam menurunkan turnover intention perawat: A systematic review. Jurnal Penelitian Kesehatan Suara Forikas, 10(1), 62–67. https://doi.org/10.33846/sf11215

Dewi, D. A. K., & Prasetya, B. E. A. (2019). Kebermaknaan kerja ditinjau dari jenis kelamin pada karyawan pt primayudha. Jurnal Psikologi Perseptual, 4(1). http://jurnal.umk.ac.id/index.php/perseptual

Do, D. A., Doan, Q. D., Vu, L. K., Le, T. T., Tran, N. M., & Nguyen, G. L. (2023). Antecedents of turnover intention among Gen z in Vietnam: The mediating role of affective commitment. Cogent Business and Management, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2267811

Doktorová, D., Barok, A., & Bajzíková, Ľ. (2025). Employee turnover as a challenge for human resource managers. In Data-Centric Business and Applications. (Vol. 253, pp. 17–38). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-89718-4_2

Dwidienawati, D., & Gandasari, D. (2018). Understandinng indonesia’s generasi Z. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 3(25), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1362/147539214x14024779483591

Dwidienawati, D., Suwarno, Brinton, K., Sugiarti, R., & Setiadi, S. (2023). The influence of work passion and meaningful work on turnover intention on the millenial generation. E3S Web of Conferences, 426. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342602134

Farid, R., Juriana, E., & Asri, D. H. (2024). Peranan sustainable hrm practice terhadap job satisfaction dan turnover intention pada perusahaan manufaktur di kota batam. Journal of Management Small and Medium Enterprises (SME’s), 17.

FledgeWorks. (2025, March 4). Generation z & high turnover rate in the workplace. https://fledgeworks.com/generation-z-high-turnover-rate-workplace/#:~:text=The%20entry%20of%20Generation%20Z,and%20demand%20for%20career%20growth

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R. Springer.

Halim, L., & Antolis, K. (2021). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi turnover intention agent di PT AIA cabang X Malang. Ekonomi, Keuangan, Investasi Dan Syariah (EKUITAS), 2(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.47065/ekuitas.v2i2.667

Hanifah, H., & Wardono, P. (2020). Identifikasi faktor pembentuk perilaku pencari kerja generasi z di Indonesia. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.17358/jabm.6.3.628

Hasan, I., & Djudiyah. (2023). Pekerjaanmu bermakna, apa sebabnya? (Antecedents of meaningful work): Scoping review. Buletin Psikologi, 31(2), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.89160

Ismail, D. H., & Nugroho, J. (2022). Kompetensi kerja gen Z di era revolusi industri 4.0 dan society 5.0. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidkan, 5(4), 1300–1307.

Kartika, R., & Gunawah, A. W. (2022). Pengaruh transformational leadership terhadap turnover intention generasi z melalui internal communication dan employee engagement. Journal Transformation of Mandalika, 3(2), 2962–2956.

Kristiana, I. F., Fajrianthu, & Purwono, U. (2018). Analisis rasch dalam utrecht work engagement scale-9 (uwes-9) versi Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Psikologi, 17(2), 204–217.

Kuancintami, A., & Heryjanto, A. (2023). Increase employee retention: Impact work-life balance, meaningful work, and job satisfaction towards turnover intention. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 4(11), 1099–1113. http://jiss.publikasiindonesia.id/

Latifa, S., & Rojuaniah, R. (2022). Hubungan antara beban pekerjaan, meaningful work, turnover intention, dan kinerja karyawan. Sibatik Journal: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan, 1(10), 2181–2194. https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v1i10.321

Muchtadin, & Sundary, Z. E. (2023). Pengaruh komitmen afektif, stres kerja, work engagement terhadap turnover intention perawat bakti timah pangkalpinang. Journal of Health Management Research, 2(2).

Mulyati, R., Himam, F., Riyono, B., & Suhariadi, F. (2019). Model work engagement angkatan kerja generasi millennial dengan meaningful work sebagai mediator. Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology (GamaJoP), 5(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamajop.47964

Nguyen Ngoc, T., Viet Dung, M., Rowley, C., & Pejić Bach, M. (2022). Generation Z job seekers’ expectations and their job pursuit intention: Evidence from transition and emerging economy. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790221112548

Opriş, I., & Cenuşă, V. E. (2017). Subject-Spotting experimental method for Gen Z. TEM Journal, 6(4), 683–692. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM64-06

Pauline, E., & Henha, N. (2017). A review of existing turnover intention theories. International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, 11(11), 2760–2767.

Pratiwi, E. A., Ningrum, D. S. A., & Sari, T. R. M. (2021). Hubungan antara meaningful work dan work engagement pada karyawan di fakultas psikologi unjani. Humanitas, 5(3), 321–336.

Putranti, H. R. D. (2022). Turnover intention. Eureka Media Aksara.

Rainer, P. (2023, August 29). Sensus BPS: Saat ini Indonesia didominasi oleh gen z. Goodstats.

Ramadhani, A., & Nindyati, A. D. (2022). Gambaran makna kerja bagi generasi z di jakarta. INQUIRY Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 13(1), 41–60.

Reformasianto, V. L., & Faizah, N. (2024). Leadership challenges in managing generation z: An indonesian work culture perspective. Desember, 13(4), 639–646. https://doi.org/10.30872/psikostudia.v13i4

Rohayati, T., Destalani, A. A., Arizka, H. D., Fahrezi, M. D., & Dwidienawati, D. (2023). Impact of job satisfaction, positive organizational culture and meaningful work on turnover intention in gen z. WSEAS Transactions on Systems, 22, 613–621. https://doi.org/10.37394/23202.2023.22.62

Sari, P. A., & Pitaloka, D. (2024). Perbedaan keterlibatan kerja dan turnover intention ditinjau dari perbedaan generasi (milenial dan zilenial). Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 4(4).

Sari, S. Y., Aima, M. H., & Zefriyenni. (2024). Mengurai turnover intention: Strategi mempertahankan karyawan (M. H. Aima, Ed.). CV. Gita Lentera.

Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471

Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 71–92.

Siahaan, F. L., & Gatari, E. (2020). Searching for meaning: The mediating role of work engagement in the relationship between meaningful work and turnover intention of millennials. Psikohumaniora, 5(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.21580/pjpp.v5i1.4305

Sidorcuka, I., & Chesnovicka, A. (2017). Methods of attraction and retention of generation z staff. CBU International Conference Proceedings, 5, 807–814. https://doi.org/10.12955/cbup.v5.1030

Steger, M. F., Dik, B. J., & Duffy, R. D. (2012). Measuring meaningful work: The work and meaning inventory (WAMI). Journal of Career Assessment, 20(3), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711436160

Subhaktiyasa, P. G. (2024). PLS-SEM for multivariate analysis: A practical guide to educational eesearch using SmartPLS. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 4(3), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline2861

Utami, F. P., & Siswanto, T. (2021). Pengaruh employer branding dan employee engagement terhadap turnover intention generasi z pada industri FMCG. Liquidity: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 10(2), 236–246.

Van, T. P. (2024). The relationship between meaningful work and turnover intention of preschool teachers: The mediating role of work engagement. Management Research and Practice, 16.

Vermooten, N., Boonzaier, B., & Kidd, M. (2019). Job crafting, proactive personality and meaningful work: Implications for employee engagement and turnover intention. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 45. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v45i0.1567

Veronica, C., & Moerkardjono, S. R. (2018). Meaningful work dan komitmen terhadap organisasi pada dosen. Jurnal Ilmu Perilaku, 3(2), 82–94.

Vogel, R. M., Rodell, J. B., & Sabey, T. B. (2020). Meaningfulness misfit: Consequences of daily meaningful work needs–supplies incongruence for daily engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(7), 760–770. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000464

Wardani, P. I., Handayani, T., & Suciningtya, S. (2022). Peran mediasi job satisfaction terhadap turnover intention : Pengaruh person organization fit, komitmen organisasi, dan work engagement. COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(07). https://doi.org/10.36418/comserva.v2i07.431

Wulandari, E. P., Lubis, R., & Hardjo, S. (2023). Pengaruh meaningful work terhadap intensi turnover melalui mediasi kepuasan kerja. Jurnal Diversita, 9(2), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.31289/diversita.v9i2.10283

Yamin, S. (2021). Tutorial statistik: Spss, lisrel, warpls & jasp (mudah & aplikatif). PT. Dewangga Energi Internasional.

Yanistasa, M., Hindiarto, F., & Priyanto, P. H. (2024). Hubungan komitmen organisasi dan iklim organisasi dengan turnover intention pada karyawan gen z. Jurnal Psikologi, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.24014/jp.v14i2.23077

You, J., Kim, S., Kim, K., Cho, A., & Chang, W. (2021). Conceptualizing meaningful work and its implications for HRD. European Journal of Training and Development, 45(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-01-2020-0005

Yusuf, F. A., & Widodo, W. (2023). The secret of reducing turnover intention: Evidence from Indonesia. Cogent Business and Management, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2202026

Zeyrofi, M., Shabara, D. D., Arbi, M. F., Emilisa, N., & Berliyanti, D. O. (2024). Faktor faktor yang mempengaruhi turnover intention pada karyawan perusahaan jasa ekspedisi. Journal of Human And Education, 4(6), 883–894.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-24

How to Cite

violla dwi puspita, Rahmad Purnama, & Ira Hidayati. (2026). Turnover Intention pada Gen Z: Peran Meaningful Work dan Work Engagement sebagai Mediator. IDEA: Jurnal Psikologi, 10(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.32492/idea.v10i1.10101