Power Asymmetry in Credit Dispute Resolution and the Role of Notaries in Mediating Bank–Debtor Relations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32492/JPP.V10i1.10108Keywords:
Power asymmetry, Credit dispute resolution, Notaries, Bank–debtor relations, Socio-legal analysisAbstract
This study employs a qualitative socio-legal approach using a narrative literature review to examine power asymmetry in credit dispute resolution, focusing on the role of notaries in mediating bank–debtor relations. Existing studies have emphasized legal certainty and contractual arrangements, while limited attention has been given to power dynamics in negotiation and dispute resolution processes. Data were drawn from legal, economic, and institutional literature and analyzed thematically to identify patterns of power relations, intermediary roles, and dispute resolution mechanisms. The findings show that power asymmetry is structurally embedded through contractual dominance, information asymmetry, institutional legitimacy, and relational networks favoring banks. Within this structure, notaries occupy an ambivalent position as intermediaries, acting as mediators, facilitators, and, in some contexts, reproducers of power imbalance. Credit dispute resolution is therefore not a neutral legal process but a negotiation arena shaped by unequal access to resources, information, and authority. This study argues for a shift from a legal-formal perspective toward a power-centered analytical framework. By conceptualizing notaries as multifunctional intermediaries, the study contributes to socio-legal scholarship and offers practical insights for promoting fairness in credit systems and dispute resolution.
References
Bourdieu, P. (1987). The force of law: Toward a sociology of the juridical field. Hastings Law Journal, 38(5), 814–853.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Burke, B. (1976). The Notaire in North America: A Short Study of the Adaptation of a Civil Law Institution. Tulane Law Review, 50(2), 318–336. https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/facsch_lawrev/864
Chen, Y., Ou, W., Pang, M., Ma, J., Yue, Q., & Han, W. (2025). A cross-chain model for warehouse receipts in port supply chain based on notary mechanism and ShangMi cryptographic algorithms. Scientific Reports 15(1), 1–19.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fathurahman, A., Utomo, S., & Purnawan, A. (2019). Notary Role In The Bonding Object To The Settlement Of Liability Rights In Banking Credit Loss (Case Study In Semarang). International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 6(4), 777–782.
Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing, 24(4), 230–235.
Jung, S., Koh, S., & Kim, Y. (2023). Coordinated Supply Contracts for a Two-Echelon Supply Chain under Given Bargaining Powers.
Toffano, P., Yuan, K., & Mcginn, J. (2019). E-Shekels: The electronic silk road. IMF Working Papers, 2019 (04), 1-45.
Yuanitasari, D. (2017). The Role of Public Notary in Providing Legal Protection on Standard Contracts for Indonesian Consumers. Padjajaran Journal of Law 1(2), 179–190.
Banakar, R. (2024). The politics of legal cultures. In Normativity in Legal Sociology: Methodological Reflections on Law and Regulation in Late Modernity (pp. 123–144). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09650-6_7
Canfield, M. (2026). The promises and tensions of socio-legal participatory action research. May, 560–575. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552325100219
Castellano, G. G. (2024). Don’t Call It a Failure: Systemic Risk Governance for Complex Financial Systems. Law & Social Inquiry, 49(4), 2245–2286. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2024.8
Fantacci, L., & Lorenzini, M. (2024). Technology versus trust: Non-bank credit systems from notarized loans in Early Modern Europe to cryptolending. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 69 (April 2023), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2023.11.010
Fischer, A., Pascucci, S., & Dolfsma, W. (2021). Understanding the role of institutional intermediaries in the emergence of the circular economy. In H. Kopnina & K. Poldner (eds.), Circular Economy: Challenges and Opportunities for Ethical and Sustainable Business (pp. 108–126). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367816650-8
Gelderblom, O., Vicq, A. De, Jonker, J., & Peeters, R. (2023). Exploring modern bank penetration : Evidence from early twentieth-century Netherlands. 892–916. https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.13218
Hoffman, P. T., Postel-vinay, G., & Rosenthal, J. (2015). Entry , information , and fi nancial development : A century of competition between French banks and notaries. Explorations in Economic History, 55, 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2014.04.002
Mantovani, M. (2019). Notaries and their debt-collection writs under the Brussels Ia Regulation . A difficult characterisation. 1048. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2019.1645973
Najwan, G. A. (2024). The Role of The Position of a Notary in Bank Credit Agreements. 9(2), 230–247. https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v9i2.4005
Schnell, S., Kim, J., Munno, G., & Nabatchi, T. (2024). How citizens want to “see” the state: Exploring the relationship between transparency and public values. Public Administration Review, 84(2), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13769
Zahro, V. (2023). Juridical Implications of the Issuance of Covernotes by A Notary as Basis of Disbursing Credit of Banking. 4(2), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.19184/JIK.v
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 muhammad hafid arisanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
